Happy Birthday: Space station celebrates 10 years




CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. – NASA couldn't have staged it any better: 10 people in orbit for Thursday's 10th anniversary of the world's most elaborate and expensive housing project, the international space station.

On Nov. 20, 1998, the first part of the space station was launched by the Russians from Kazakhstan. NASA followed up two weeks later with piece No. 2 carried up by a space shuttle. Astronauts and cosmonauts moved in two years later, and the rest, as they say, is history.

The space station has grown into a behemoth outpost 220 miles up, home to three people at any given time — soon to be six.

Thanks to the newly arrived shuttle Endeavour, the space station now has five sleep stations, two baths, two kitchens and two mini-gyms. All told, there are nine rooms, three of them full-scale labs.

Three-quarters complete, the total mass is 627,000 pounds. NASA says it's about the size of a five-bedroom house.

Some other fascinating factoids: The space station has traveled 1.3 billion miles, orbited Earth more than 57,300 times, hosted 167 people from 15 countries, and served up more than 19,000 meals.

The space station has taken longer for NASA and its international partners to build, cost more money and produced less science than originally envisioned. But that hasn't spoiled the celebrations going on all over the world — and off.

For the record, the linked Endeavour and space station sailed past the 10-year mark at 1:40 a.m. EST Thursday while the astronauts slept. Mission Control marked the occasion by showing video of the first rocket's launch in 1998.

"After 10 years, we wish the international space station a happy birthday and we hope to see many, many more," Endeavour commander Christopher Ferguson said in a taped message from the orbiting complex.

Later Thursday, flight controllers around the world exchanged wishes of "Happy Birthday!" and "Happy Anniversary!" with the station's skipper, Mike Fincke.

Before rocketing away aboard Endeavour last Friday, astronaut Donald Pettit noted that every major engineering marvel has had its share of dragged-out schedules, budget overruns, controversy, even scandal.

"How long did it take us to build the Panama Canal, Brooklyn Bridge?" Pettit said.

As for the space station, "We're 10 years down the road, and it still isn't built. It's almost built. And it's an amazing, wonderful piece of technology that once it's done, people probably won't even think too much about how long it took to build," said Pettit, who called the complex home for five months in 2002-2003.

To date, it's taken 80 rocket launchings from Florida, Kazakhstan and French Guyana (the launching site for the European Space Agency's cargo carrier) to make and staff the space station.

The price tag, from start to finish, is often quoted at $100 billion. That includes money spent not only by the United States and Russia, but also Canada, Japan and the 18-nation European Space Agency. NASA disputes that amount and estimates its share at $44 billion, including shuttle launch costs.

As for delays, the 2003 Columbia disaster set space station construction back by a few years. So did Russian financial problems in the 1990s that significantly delayed the launch of the first crew's living quarters.

Its objective also has shifted over the years. NASA views the space station as essentially a place to learn more about astronaut health and other issues that could make or break future expeditions to the moon, Mars and beyond. Before, the emphasis was supposed to be on basic scientific experiments, like protein crystals and cell tissue.

Managers like to point out that the technical problems that have cropped up in orbit over the years — a torn solar wing and jammed solar wing-rotating joint to name a few — are lessons learned for deep-space travel.

The Russians, meanwhile, have used the space station as a cash cow, selling rocket rides to the occasional millionaire tourist to help keep their program going.

NASA expects to wrap up space station construction in 2010 when the three remaining space shuttles are retired. Astronauts then will have to hitch rides on Russian spacecraft until NASA's new rocketship is available to crews, most likely in 2015. That gap is an unavoidable thorn in NASA's side; it's possible the projected five-year hiatus in human launchings from U.S. soil could be whittled a little.

NASA Administrator Michael Griffin, who expects to be replaced in the Obama administration, has said repeatedly that the space agency does not have the money to keep flying the shuttles beyond 2010 if it wants to keep its new rocketship and moon exploration plans on track.

"The moon is not the end goal, just like the space station is not the end goal," Griffin noted. "The moon is a stepping stone on the way out."

Source: yahoo science news

"Facts and Speculations in Cosmology" - public lecture by Prof.Jayant Narli

`Facts and Speculations in Cosmology'

by Professor Jayant Narlikar,

Emeritus Professor,
Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics,
Pune, India

3rd December 2008 (Wednesday), 4 PM

Public Lecture 64th Annual Sessions of SLAAS

Prof V K Samaranayake Auditorium, UCSC
University of Colombo

FACTS AND SPECULATIONS IN COSMOLOGY


This talk will discuss the present state of cosmology, the subject
dealing with the studies of the origin, evolution and end of the
universe in the large. In ancient times the thinkers had detailed
and complex notions about the cosmos but those were speculations
with no basis in real facts. With the progress of observational
astronomy, our understanding about larger and larger parts of the
universe grew and speculations gave place to more facts and science
based ideas. Modern cosmology is around a century old and it took
shape around Einstein's general relativity and the data on galaxies
from Edwin Hubble and his coworkers. Thus the concept of the
expanding universe was born. We will describe the successes of this
concept which have led cosmologists in modern times to be bolder and
apply their equations to find what the universe was like soon after
the big bang. It will be argued that despite the claimed results of
this approach, it is highly speculative and in many respects
unscientific.

Bio
Professor Jayant Vishnu Narlikar (born July 19,1938) (Marathi: प्रा. जयंत विष्णू नारळीकर) is an eminent Indian astrophysicist. Narlikar is considered a leading expert and defender of the steady state cosmology. His work on conformal gravity theory with Sir Fred Hoyle, called Hoyle-Narlikar theory, demonstrated a synthesis can be achieved between Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity and Mach's principle. India’s second highest civilian honour, Padma Vibhushan, was awarded to him for his work. Prof. Narlikar is the founder director of the Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics (IUCAA) at Pune, India.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jayant_Narlikar

First fuzzy photos of planets outside solar system


Earth seems to have its first fuzzy photos of alien planets outside our solar system, images captured by two teams of astronomers. The pictures show four likely planets that appear as specks of white, nearly indecipherable except to the most eagle-eyed experts. All are trillions of miles away — three of them orbiting the same star, and the fourth circling a different star.

None of the four giant gaseous planets are remotely habitable or remotely like Earth. But they raise the possibility of others more hospitable.

It's only a matter of time before "we get a dot that's blue and Earthlike," said astronomer Bruce Macintosh of the Lawrence Livermore National Lab. He led one of the two teams of photographers.

"It is a step on that road to understand if there are other planets like Earth and potentially life out there," he said.

Macintosh's team used two ground-based telescopes, while the second team relied on photos from the 18-year-old Hubble Space Telescope to gather images of the exoplanets — planets that don't circle our sun. The research from both teams was published in Thursday's online edition of the journal Science.

In the past 13 years, scientists have discovered more than 300 planets outside our solar system, but they have done so indirectly, by measuring changes in gravity, speed or light around stars.

NASA's space sciences chief Ed Weiler said the actual photos are important. He compared it to a hunt for elusive elephants: "For years we've been hearing the elephants, finding the tracks, seeing the trees knocked down by them, but we've never been able to snap a picture. Now we have a picture."

In a news conference Thursday, Weiler said this fulfills the last of the major goals that NASA had for the Hubble telescope before it launched in 1990: "This is an 18 1/2-year dream come true."

There are disputes about whether these are the first exoplanet photos. Others have made earlier claims, but those pictures haven't been confirmed as planets or universally accepted yet. The photos released Thursday are being published in a scientifically prominent journal, but that still hasn't convinced all the experts. Alan Boss, an exoplanet expert at the Carnegie Institution of Washington, and Harvard exoplanet hunter Lisa Kaltenegger both said more study is needed to confirm these photos are proven planets and not just brown dwarf stars.

MIT planetary scientist Sara Seager, at the NASA press conference, said earlier planetary claims "are in a gray area." But these discoveries, "everybody would agree is a planet," said Seager, who was not part of either planet-finding team.

The Hubble team this spring compared a 2006 photo to one of the same body taken by Hubble in 2004. The scientists used that to show that the object orbited a star and was part of a massive red dust ring which is usually associated with planets — making it less likely to be a dwarf star.

Macintosh's team used ground-based telescopes to spot three other planets orbiting a different star. That makes it less likely they are a pack of brown dwarf stars.

The planet discovered by Hubble is one of the smallest exoplanets found yet. It's somewhere between the size of Neptune and three times bigger than Jupiter. And it may have a Saturn-like ring.

It circles the star Fomalhaut, pronounced FUM-al-HUT, which is Arabic for "mouth of the fish." It's in the constellation Piscis Austrinus and is relatively close by — a mere 148 trillion miles away, practically a next-door neighbor by galactic standards. The planet's temperature is around 260 degrees, but that's cool by comparison to other exoplanets.

The planet is only about 200 million years old, a baby compared to the more than 4 billion-year-old planets in our solar system. That's important to astronomers because they can study what Earth and planets in our solar system may have been like in their infancy, said Paul Kalas at the University of California, Berkeley. Kalas led the team using Hubble to discover Fomalhaut's planet.

One big reason the picture looks fuzzy is that the star Fomalhaut is 100 million times brighter than its planet.

The team led by Macintosh at Lawrence Livermore found its planets a little earlier, spotting the first one in 2007, but taking extra time to confirm the trio of planets circling a star in the Pegasus constellation. The star is about 767 trillion miles away, but visible with binoculars. It's called HR 8799, and the three planets orbiting it are seven to 10 times larger than Jupiter, Macintosh said.

"I've been doing this for eight years and after eight years we get three at once," he said.

Listen to Jupiter

Jupiter is a wonderful object for radio study. It is somewhat predictable and yet often surprising in its violent outbursts below 40 MHz. You can receive Jupiter using relatively simple equipment or you can construct complex spectrograph receivers and build monstrous antenna arrays to capture its more subtle messages. The complex relationship between the gas giant planet and its volcanic moon Io is not completely understood, but we do know these bodies work together to produce "radio noise storms" as they pirouette through space. Many factors come into play for the amateur radio astronomer who tries to capture a noise storm. In order maximize your chances of success, you should take time to understand the potential hurdles and optimize your equipment for this task



Materials
69” copper tube
4 pieces of 12” wood (for upright support)
24” × 24” wire mesh
24” × 24” piece of wood (for square frame)
1.5m antenna cable
portable radio with short wave band (SW 2)
U bolts (optional)
Nails
Duck tape


Procedure

• Nail together the 24” × 24” square base. (wire mesh on to the piece of wood)
• Nail on the 5 upright supports.
• Attach the antenna loop to the uprights with the U bolts. If you don't have U bolts, tie or wire the antenna loop in place. The distance from the wire mesh to the antenna loop is 12”.
• Attach the antenna cable to the open ends or the antenna loop. You can do this by inserting the bare ends of the antenna cable into the open ends of the tube. Then, flatten the tube onto the wire with pliers, or use a large screw inserted into the ends of the tube.
• Connect the other ends of the antenna wires to the radio. If your radio has a special place to connect an extra antenna, use that. If your radio just has a stick antenna, wrap 2 meters of insulated wire around the antenna. Attach the antenna cable to this wire.
• Turn on the radio and select SW 2. Look closely at the numbers beside SW 2. Turn the volume up and tune towards the 21 MHz end of the dial. Your antenna will work best here.
• Turn the tuning knob slowly as you listen. You should be hearing interesting sounds like hums, hisses and chirps, maybe even some foreign languages. You are detecting a variety of electromagnetic signals. Some might be coming from radio stations halfway around the world. Some could be secret codes from spies. Others will be signals from electrons stopping and going inside the machines close to you. Your refrigerator sends out signals and so does the transformer on a pole outside. But some of these sounds are signals arriving from planets and stars deep in space!
• This antenna is designed to detect radio storms on Jupiter. You can check this out for yourself. First, find out where in the sky Jupiter appears. Then, tune the radio to a spot where nothing else is interfering. All you should hear is a steady, gentle hiss. Now, point the antenna at Jupiter and listen. If a radio storm is happening, you might hear something.





Reference:


http://www.radiosky.com/
http://radiojove.gsfc.nasa.gov/